Obnoxious Opinions
I once made a rude and unfair remark about hating young people with opinions. I made it after I heard two high school students talk about the “message” in a Hedley song (there was no message, the song was an annoying top 40 hit that no one will remember five years from now).
I made it again after I offered to buy the friend of a friend’s younger brother a hot chocolate from Starbucks, and he said it was stupid to buy coffee that you “had to take out a second mortgage for.” One should not criticize a kind offering from a near stranger. It was a nice gesture on the part of a [relatively] mentally astute young woman, not a creepy enticement from a pantsless man in a 1989 Oldsmobile.
After browsing a few pro-family (and pro-family always means anti-sex but pro-gun, go figure) websites, I hate at least 60 percent of people with opinions.
To the “no kissing before marriage” crowd: You must be joking. Kissing – the mere touching of mouths – is now considered (by some, not all) to be an impure practice that compromises a couple’s Christian integrity before the bounds of holy matrimony make it okay to have vigorous, unprotected anal sex in the honeymoon suite at the Holiday Inn? Tell me it’s not true (it is)!
Kissing, some people on the Focus on the Family blog argue, is a prelude to sex. A wet tongued temptress forcing you to tear off your pants and consummate your unholy union, leading to the inevitable disappointment of God, Jesus and your mother.
Here’s the thing – an act becomes most tempting when it’s naughty. No one feels a rebellious rush when studying for a test or volunteering at a food bank. Why? Because those are things you’re supposed to do, things that society encourages (and for good reason). When people – particularly people in positions of authority, parents included – start condemning acts and warning of grave consequences, curiosity is peaked and overindulgence ensues. This is why the cool kids drink too much and smoke too often and drive really, really fast. It’s cliche behavior, but it’s still a little badass. All girls still say they want a man who’s “a little bit of a bad boy,” don’t they?
All I know is this, if people have no intention of having sex at a certain point in time, a kiss won’t turn them into rabid nymphomaniacs, unless they’re overwhelmed and enticed by the dastardly immorality of their scandalous actions.
As far as other young opinions go, I recall being encouraged to “think critically” in my elementary school days by having light ethical questions posed to me and other classmates. The favourite question, other than “why was the Holocaust bad?”, was “is it right to keep animals in captivity?”
That’s a stupid fucking question for several reasons. One, all kids will say it’s bad because they’ll feel that’s the right answer. Second, it’s unfair because all children love zoos, and need not be guilted into relinquishing the joy that comes from an activity not involving sneaking their mom’s cigarettes. Thirdly, animals in captivity (this includes domesticated pets, by the by) don’t know any different, so they don’t care. If they’re well fed and cared for, they’re as content as they can be.
Furthermore, anyone who watches the Discovery Channel knows that while zoo animals may not be free, they’re safe from predators and starvation and habitat destruction and poachers. You can’t draw some unreasonable parallel between zoos and fascist governments who trade freedom for safety either, because that’s not an appropriate analogy. Animals have only one “civil” right, and that’s the right to humane treatment from humans. They don’t vote or protest or write strongly worded letters to politicians. They sleep, eat, shit and play, and adequately run zoos allow them to do so in peace. Also, zoos bring people joy, and there isn’t enough joy in the world as it is.
Zoos, really, are the least of the animal kingdom’s problems. If I was a tiger or polar bear or shark or lemur, I’d want to live in captivity. I’d get used to the stares and shrieks and greasy fingerprints on the walls of my spacious enclosure, and I’d likely never yearn for a short and brutal life somewhere in Africa.
So, the point of this post (I think), is to stop asking kids about the ethical nature of zoos. It breeds obnoxious opinions that make me angry.
Birds of Paradise
I’m watching Planet Earth on Blu-ray. The picture is exceptional and the sound superb. My dog thinks there are actual sharks in the living room – he’s been trying to catch them for the past 10 minutes.
I just saw a segment on birds of paradise. If you’re not familiar with the animals, I can’t think of a way to describe them. They’re tropical birds that have upside down umbrellas for wings, and they lift these elaborate hula skirt-type things up to their chins to tap dance for potential mates. Not only do they sing and dance, they clean! Upon waking, they immediately tidy their dwellings, going so far as to sand their branchy bachelor pads with bits of bark (I’m not kidding). When a curious girl comes looking for a possible baby-daddy, they turn their wings into superhero capes and do a jig that would take most people two years to learn.
These bizarre birds turn into tiny dancing batmans with makeshift fedoras to impress females. They bob and jiggle and thrust and gyrate and beat-box with their feet. Their wings somehow develop glowing blue eyes to add a fantastical sci-fi element to the mating ritual.
It makes me wonder if women were ever meant to chase men. If male birds do choreographed hip-hop dances to impress females (sometimes to no avail), perhaps human women should request a bombastic song and dance routine on every first date. Something with spunk and colour and style, something that hints at how incredible sex will be.
I think people would like dating more if they took the lessons of these birds to heart. Even a failed connection would provide some entertainment, and a spurned man would have at least gotten a vigorous work-out in.
Everyone would win, I say.
“His personality wasn’t great, but those magical green eyes that popped up on his chest while he danced the charleston…that was something!”
-
Archives
- October 2009 (2)
- June 2009 (1)
- May 2009 (1)
- April 2009 (2)
- March 2009 (3)
- February 2009 (3)
- January 2009 (2)
- August 2008 (2)
- June 2008 (2)
- May 2008 (2)
- April 2008 (4)
- March 2008 (2)
-
Categories
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS